Sunday, February 23, 2020
Jan 11

Written by: Diana West
Friday, January 11, 2013 5:21 AM 

Pt. 1 is here.

How could this -- Alwaleed's editorial interference to omit "Muslim" from "Muslim rioting" in a Fox crawl in 2005 --  not have been the begining?

That's the question I weigh in this week's column, testing it in those perplexing omissions in News Corp.'s coverage of the Gore deal -- omissions regarding Al Jazeera's strong ideological linkage with and political bias toward the Muslim Brotherhood, and omissions regarding Muslim Brotherhood leading figure Yusef Al Qaradawi and his role at Al Jazeera.

But there is a more important connection to make and Fox omission to note.

In the column and related news report, I discuss Al Risala, an Islamic channel that both Alwaleed and -- through Murdoch's 18.97 percent ownership of Al Risala's parent company Rotana -- Murdoch own. (Rotana is Alwaleed's Arabic media company.) On the "supreme advisory board" of Al Risala sits Abdullah Omar Naseef. Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy has decribed Naseef as "a major Muslim Brotherhood figure involved in the financing of al-Qaeda." McCarthy's quotation comes from the stunning expose he wrote last summer documenting the ties between Secretary of State Clinton's top aide Huma Abedin and leading Muslim Brotherhood figures and fronts, which include Abedin's family members They also include Naseef. (Read the evidence here.)

The Abedin-Naseef-MB-Clinton morass is another story Fox News et al have ignored. And I mean, ignored. Fox, however, is not alone. All media, with rare exceptions, have blunted their curiosity and turned their eyes from this hot, hot story that, at the minimum, demands questions and answers from Abedin and Clinton to determine whether we are be looking at a case of hostile penetration and influence similar to when Alger Hiss was the right-hand-man of Secretary of State Edward Stettinius, or, at the very least, a case of reckless security clearance. (NB: the Washington Examiner refused to run my columns on the subject when Rep. Michele Bachmann was rightfully drawing attention to the subject last summer.) And while all media are guilty of a kind of professional abdication, Fox bears special responsibility due to its ripple-effect-influence -- much like the New York Times over the MSM -- on other conservative media. It bears a special blame, too, due to its compromised ownership.

Through Alwaleed (and Murdoch), we now know there is, in effect, what we might think of as one degree of separation between Fox and Naseef, who, among other things, is founder of Rabita Trust. As McCarthy's report notes, Rabita Trust is "formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization under American law due to its support of al-Qaeda."

Does any of this bear on Fox's failure to investigate, for example, the Abedin story? To alert Americans to the stealth jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood? How could it not have bear on the omission of such stories? I believe we are watching Alwaleed's "Fox Effect." We don't report so you can't decide -- or know anything about it.

Meanwhile, I wonder whether the Alwaleed-Naseef and, by extension, -Murdoch relationship actually breaks any existing US anti-terrorism law. If not, there remains something stinkingly morally wrong with this relationship existing among the owners of a flagship US news company, whose headquarters, don't forget, are in New York City. Where this whole story began.

It's time for Murdoch to divest now.

<February 2020>
February, 2020
January, 2020
December, 2019
November, 2019
October, 2019
September, 2019
August, 2019
July, 2019
June, 2019
May, 2019
April, 2019
March, 2019
February, 2019
January, 2019
December, 2018
November, 2018
October, 2018
September, 2018
August, 2018
July, 2018
June, 2018
May, 2018
April, 2018
March, 2018
February, 2018
January, 2018
December, 2017
November, 2017
October, 2017
September, 2017
August, 2017
July, 2017
June, 2017
May, 2017
April, 2017
March, 2017
February, 2017
January, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
October, 2016
September, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
June, 2016
May, 2016
April, 2016
March, 2016
February, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
September, 2015
August, 2015
July, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
March, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
November, 2014
October, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
April, 2013
March, 2013
February, 2013
January, 2013
December, 2012
November, 2012
October, 2012
September, 2012
August, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2012 by Diana West