Thursday, July 03, 2008

BUY THE BOOK TODAY!


"Brilliant and irreverent"
- Tony Blankley


"Not to be missed by anyone concerned about the future of America and the West"
- Robert Bork


"Illuminating and provocative"
- Lou Dobbs


"A phenomenal book that will truly alter the way you view society"
- Steven Emerson


"Vigorously argued, far-reaching and timely"
- Paul Johnson


"What makes West's invaluable analysis stand apart is her connection of the death of the grown-up to the post-9/11 political, intellectual and moral paralysis that imperils us today."
- Michelle Malkin


"Penetrating and witty"
- George F. Will

Subscribe to Blog

RSS Feed 

 



Location: BlogsDiana West    
Posted by: Diana West Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:28 AM

One of the more socially destructive aspects of the (Bill) Clinton legacy has been the elevation of Brazening It Out--"It" being the kind of scandal that once upon a time shamed politicians into resignation over breaching what were once widely recognized as the boundaries of propriety through extra-marital affairs, gambling, and other reckless behaviors.

GOP Sen. John Vitter of DC Madam infamy comes to mind as one who, pre-Bill (and Monica), would have quietly disappeared, but there are many others. GOP Rep. Vito Fosella, whose drunk-driving arrest led to revelations of a longstanding affair and illegitimate child with a retired Air Force Colonel --a lady--is still on the fence over whether he will resign or run for re-electon.

Having decided to tough out Utter Exposure--with no regard for the deletrious impact that revelations of his low-life behavior would have both on citizens (including children), and the world (including terrorists)--Bill Clinton made himself the Patron Saint of Political Survival at Any Cost. All that was required to worship at this altar was the sacrifice of shame.

It also required the approval--or, if not approval, apathy--of his peer group and the public. But I am wondering if we are seeing any incremental change here. Today's New York Times carries a story out of Ohio that reveals some encouraging gumption of the part of the offending official's  peer group. It seems the Democratic attorney general Marc Dann has finally resigned over an admitted extra-marital affair and related sexual harassment charges after having "refused Gov. Ted Strickland’s repeated public calls for him to step down." What made the difference?

The NYT reports:

The scandal that resulted in his downfall began on April 6 when The Columbus Dispatch reported that two women in his office had filed sexual harassment complaints against Anthony Gutierrez, a leading aide and longtime friend.

Less than a month later, Mr. Dann — 46, married and the father of three children — admitted to an affair with his scheduler and acknowledged that it had contributed to an office atmosphere that led to the harassment claims.

Mr. Strickland and seven other prominent Ohio Democrats sent him a letter last week demanding his resignation, but he refused. “I am in the office, have rolled up my sleeves and am working on behalf of the people of the state of Ohio,” he wrote in an e-mail message to his staff.

Here we see Dann following the Clinton playbook--striking the old working-on-behalf-of-the-people pose. But his fellow Democrats didn't play with him as Congressional Democrats with Clinton did back in the Bad Old Nineties.

But on Tuesday, Democratic legislators introduced nine articles of impeachment against him, accusing him of obstructing an internal investigation into sexual harassment. In a second inquiry, investigators for the state inspector general raided Mr. Dann’s office on Wednesday and confiscated a number of computers.

Maybe the Ohio Dems simply didn't like Dann, but maybe the Ohio Dems didn't like his behavior.

Mr. Strickland said at the news conference Wednesday that he would appoint a successor to Mr. Dann. That appointee will face a special election in November to fill out the remainder of the term, which expires in January 2011.

Asked what he wanted in a new attorney general, Mr. Strickland said, “Maturity.”

Good thinking, Guv.

 

 

     

Permalink |  Trackback
Men, Women... or Children

Once, there was a world without teenagers. Literally, "teenager," the word itself, doesn't pop into the lexicon much before 1941. That means that for all but this most recent period of history, there were children and there were adults. Children in their teen years aspired to adulthood; significantly, they didn't aspire to adolescence. Certainly, men and women didn't aspire to remain teenagers.

Today, turning thirteen, instead of bringing children closer to an adult world, launches them into a teen universe. And due to the hold our culture has placed on the maturation process, that's where they're likely to find the adults.

Most of us have grown up--or, at least, grown--into this new kind of adulthood, this perpetual adolescence so much the norm that it's difficult to recognize it as the profound civilizational shift that it is. Here to help is this blog, which will monitor the news of the day to keep tabs on the "Grown-Up" and the "Not Grown-Up" among us.



Links
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2008 by Diana West