Wednesday, July 06, 2022

American Betrayal

FINALLY -- IN AUDIOBOOK!

ALSO AVAILABLE IN PAPERBACK

"It is not simply a good book about history. It is one of those books which makes history. ... "

-- Vladimir Bukovsky, co-founder of the Soviet dissident movement and author of Judgment in Moscow, and Pavel Stroilov, author of Behind the Desert Storm.

"Diana West is distinguished from almost all political commentators because she seeks less to defend ideas and proposals than to investigate and understand what happens and what has happened. This gives her modest and unpretentious books and articles the status of true scientific inquiry, shifting the debate from the field of liking and disliking to being and non-being."

-- Olavo de Carvalho

If you're looking for something to read, this is the most dazzling, mind-warping book I have read in a long time. It has been criticized by the folks at Front Page, but they don't quite get what Ms. West has set out to do and accomplished. I have a whole library of books on communism, but -- "Witness" excepted -- this may be the best.

-- Jack Cashill, author of Deconstructing Obama: The Lives, Loves and Letters of America's First Postmodern President and First Strike: TWA Flight 800 and the Attack on America

"Every once in a while, something happens that turns a whole structure of preconceived ideas upside down, shattering tales and narratives long taken for granted, destroying prejudice, clearing space for new understanding to grow. Diana West's latest book, American Betrayal, is such an event."

 -- Henrik Raeder Clausen, Europe News

West's lesson to Americans: Reality can't be redacted, buried, fabricated, falsified, or omitted. Her book is eloquent proof of it.

-- Edward Cline, Family Security Matters

"I have read it, and agree wholeheartedly."

-- Angelo Codevilla, Professor Emeritus of International Relations at Boston Unversity, and fellow of the Claremont Institute. 

Enlightening. I give American Betrayal five stars only because it is not possible to give it six.

-- John Dietrich, formerly of the Defense Intelligence Agency and author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy.

After reading American Betrayal and much of the vituperation generated by neoconservative "consensus" historians, I conclude that we cannot ignore what West has demonstrated through evidence and cogent argument.

-- John Dale Dunn, M.D., J.D., Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons

"A brilliantly researched and argued book."

-- Edward Jay Epstein, author of Deception: The Invisible War between the KGB and the CIA, The Annals 0f Unsolved Crime 

"This explosive book is a long-needed answer to court histories that continue to obscure key facts about our backstage war with Moscow. Must-reading for serious students of security issues and Cold War deceptions, both foreign and domestic."

-- M. Stanton Evans, author of Stalin's Secret Agents and Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies

Her task is ambitious; her sweep of crucial but too-little-known facts of history is impressive; and her arguments are eloquent and witty. ... American Betrayal is one of those books that will change the way many of us see the world.

-- Susan Freis Falknor, Blue Ridge Forum

"American Betrayal is absolutely required reading. Essential. You're sleepwalking without it."

-- Chris Farrell, director of investigations research, Judicial Watch

"Diana West wrote a brilliant book called American Betrayal, which I recommend to everybody ... It is a seminal work that will grow in importance." 

-- Newt Gingrich, former House Speaker 

"This is a must read for any serious student of history and anyone working to understand the Marxist counter-state in America."

-- John Guandolo, president, Understanding the Threat, former FBI special agent 

“What Diana West has done is to dynamite her way through several miles of bedrock. On the other side of the tunnel there is a vista of a new past. Of course folks are baffled. Few people have the capacity to take this in. Her book is among the most well documented I have ever read. It is written in an unusual style viewed from the perspective of the historian—but it probably couldn’t have been done any other way.”

-- Lars Hedegaard, historian, journalist, founder, Danish Free Press Society

The polemics against your Betrayal have a familiar smell: The masters of the guild get angry when someone less worthy than they are ventures into the orchard in which only they are privileged to harvest. The harvest the outsider brought in, they ritually burn.

-- Hans Jansen, former professor of Islamic Thought, University of Utrecht 

No book has ever frightened me as much as American Betrayal. ... [West] patiently builds a story outlining a network of subversion so bizarrely immense that to write it down will seem too fantastic to anyone without the book’s detailed breadth and depth. It all adds up to a story so disturbing that it has changed my attitude to almost everything I think about how the world actually is. ... By the time you put the book down, you have a very different view of America’s war aims and strategies. The core question is, did the USA follow a strategy that served its own best interests, or Stalin’s? And it’s not that it was Stalin’s that is so compelling, since you knew that had to be the answer, but the evidence in detail that West provides that makes this a book you cannot ignore. 

-- Steven Kates, RMIT (Australia) Associate Professor of Economics, Quadrant

"Diana West's new book rewrites WWII and Cold War history not by disclosing secrets, but by illuminating facts that have been hidden in plain sight for decades. Furthermore, she integrates intelligence and political history in ways never done before."

-- Jeffrey Norwitz, former professor of counterterrorism, Naval War College

[American Betrayal is] the most important anti-Communist book of our time ... a book that can open people's eyes to the historical roots of our present malaise ... full of insights, factual corroboration, and psychological nuance. 

-- J.R. Nyquist, author, Origins of the Fourth World War 

Although I know [Christopher] Andrew well, and have met [Oleg] Gordievsky twice, I now doubt their characterization of Hopkins -- also embraced by Radosh and the scholarly community. I now support West's conclusions after rereading KGB: The Inside Story account 23 years later [relevant passages cited in American Betrayal]. It does not ring true that Hopkins was an innocent dupe dedicated solely to defeating the Nazis. Hopkins comes over in history as crafty, secretive and no one's fool, hardly the personality traits of a naïve fellow traveler. And his fingerprints are on the large majority of pro-Soviet policies implemented by the Roosevelt administration. West deserves respect for cutting through the dross that obscures the evidence about Hopkins, and for screaming from the rooftops that the U.S. was the victim of a successful Soviet intelligence operation.

-- Bernie Reeves, founder of The Raleigh Spy Conference, American Thinker

Diana West’s American Betrayal — a remarkable, novel-like work of sorely needed historical re-analysis — is punctuated by the Cassandra-like quality of “multi-temporal” awareness. ... But West, although passionate and direct, is able to convey her profoundly disturbing, multi-temporal narrative with cool brilliance, conjoining meticulous research, innovative assessment, evocative prose, and wit.

-- Andrew G. Bostom, PJ Media

Do not be dissuaded by the controversy that has erupted around this book which, if you insist on complete accuracy, would be characterized as a disinformation campaign.

-- Jed Babbin, The American Spectator

In American Betrayal, Ms. West's well-established reputation for attacking "sacred cows" remains intact. The resulting beneficiaries are the readers, especially those who can deal with the truth.

-- Wes Vernon, Renew America

If the Soviet penetration of Washington, D.C., was so wide and so deep that it functioned like an occupation …
 
If, as a result of that occupation, American statecraft became an extension of Soviet strategy …
 
If the people who caught on – investigators, politicians, defectors – and tried to warn the American public were demonized, ridiculed and destroyed for the good of that occupation and to further that strategy …
 
And if the truth was suppressed by an increasingly complicit Uncle Sam …

Would you feel betrayed?

Now available from St. Martin's Press, American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character

View Blog
Minimize
Nov 5

Written by: Diana West
Monday, November 05, 2018 7:38 AM 

Returning from a few days away, I find several emails alerting me to a recent pronouncement by David Horowitz on his supposed rift with Ronald Radosh. 

Supposed...? 

Truth be told, every time I happen to write either of those two names, I stop, halted by misgivings over  wasted time and thought. Why throw any more of either at these two longtime prevaricators now pretending to be at odds?

Pretending...?  

It's just a notion, but I think it has some appeal. If only to avoid thinking about the midterm elections now in progress (Vote GOP!), I'll tease it out for a bit. Maybe there's something there.

Background (there's always background): On August 18, 2017, FP appeared to cast Radosh out of its orbit in a curious article by Daniel Greenfield. The headline, likely by Horowitz, was: "NEVER TRUMP DRIVES A FORMER COMMUNIST BACK TO HIS ROOTS: What happens when you lose every principle except hating Trump." 

The average reader surely expects that the "roots" to which "former Communist" Radosh is alleged to be returning are Communism. What else? Reading the headline and then skimming the article the first time around, I remember getting the feeling the piece came up short. Forcing myself through a second time, I find the "roots" Radosh is "returning" to are "McCarthyism accusations." 

McCarthyism accusations? 

Guess what, gang? Radosh never left those roots. I know. In 2013, at FP, Radosh dubbed me "McCarthy's heiress," and Horowitz called American Betrayal "McCarthyism on Steroids." (Quote Horowitz: "She should not have written that book.")

So, who are they trying to kid? You. Everyone. They return to "McCarthyism" when it suits them, ho hum, and then pretend it's a big deal to return to "McCarthyism" when it suits them, woo woo.

Thus, to underscore, the 2017 FP piece does not accuse Radosh of returning to Communism -- or even to the Left. The point Greenfield makes is that Radosh, as a "Never Trumper," has no beliefs, just spite and malice against Trump.

In FP's telling, then, it is just as if Donald Trump were not the counter-revolutionary figure that he is, and that Never Trump and its allies in the so-called Resistance were not attempting to save the Revolution from his mighty, providential assault. 

To wit:

Radosh’s behavior though is emblematic of Never Trumpers who hate Trump more than the left.  

What does Radosh believe in except the evils of Trump? It’s hard to say. 

Radosh no longer believes in anything except the privileges of that class.

Personal anger has a logic that transcends politics.

In other words, Radosh is super-mad. Big deal. No ideological rift. To the contrary, Greenfield argues that Radosh, having predicted a Clinton landslide against Trump, just can't accept "the fact that he was wrong and that his certainty of how the world worked proved to be as illusory as it was during his Communist days." Notably, Greenfield harkens back to Radosh's "courage" on his accepting the long-proven guilt of the Rosenbergs (that dry morsel he has dined out on for 35 years), concluding: "The difference between conviction and fanaticism is that the ability to admit that you were wrong. It takes great courage to be able to do it once. It would take even greater courage to do it twice."

If this is a breach, it's pretty well padded.

It so happens that August 18, 2017 was also the day we learned Donald Trump cast Steve Bannon out of the White House.

What followed next at Frontpage was so bizarre it seems improbable now. Horowitz and Sebastian Gorka, Bannon's erstwhile White House lieutenant, threw themselves into a concerted build-up of Steve Bannon as the Next Big Thing, the most important man, the most powerful man in all of America -- except for maybe and not necessarily the president himself. Why, Bannon was just like "Obi Wan Kenobi," said geostrategist Gorka. Bannon had already won the 2016 David Horowitz Freedom Center's Man of the Year Award. What next -- Steve Bannon 2020?

Whether Bannon ever could have caught political fire, Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury sure did. When  the thermonuclear explosions were over, all that was left of "President Bannon" was some cold toast. That, as far as Frontpage, Horowitz and Gorka were concerned, was that.

I wrote about the whole weird episode here.

More background. Radosh spent the twelve months prior to be being allegedly cast out at FP in August 2017 repeatedly peddling a story that Bannon had proclaimed himself a "Leninist" while chatting with Radosh at David Horowitz's book party in 2013. Radosh first jump-started this tale just days after Bannon became chairman of the Trump campaign in August 2016. In all the time since, by the way, Horowitz has said nothing about it.

I know a little about this party. Shortly after it took place, Bannon told me about an exchange he had had with Radosh. Bannon said he didn't recognize the "old guy" hanging around as the party wound down until he heard him ranting about me and American Betrayal. (As Breitbart editor, Bannon had comprehesively covered the FP-led war on American Betrayal, including publishing my 22K word rebuttal, as well as essays by Vladimir Bukovsky and M. Stanton Evans.)  Aha! Radosh. "What are you complaining about?" Bannon told me he said to Radosh. "She's the only reason you're relevant."

Certainly, if ex-Trump aide Bannon (pre-Fire and Fury) was ever to become the David Horowitz Freedom Center's Great Populist Hope (and fund-raising lure?), Horowitz probably had to put some distance between himself and his lifefong comrade Radosh, no? Especially if regular old American populists (Deplorables), the people who still loathe "Reds" and "Pinkos" (or whose  parents did), were ever going to take any of "ex-Commie" Horowitz's machinations seriously. Casting out American Betrayal "take-down" artist cum Never Trumper Radosh might also help Horowitz restore his reputation among those conservatives still shaken by his appalling behavior vis a vis AB.  

As for Radosh -- surely being cut off by Horowitz, Mr. Mega-#MAGA, would serve him well in his ministrations to Never-Trump and "Resistance" journalistas.

Which brings us to what might be another #FakeSmackdown between the pair.

During a recent Florida gubanatorial debate, GOP candidiate Ron DeSantis (Vote DeSantis!) gave an impromptu demonstration of the dangers rife in believing #FakeHistory about Joseph McCarthy. Instead of calling "Foul," DeSantis called "McCarthyite" an attempt by the debate moderator to link DeSantis to David Horowitz (four speaking engagements, statement of support), specifically regarding Horowitz statements on race issues the moderator breathelessly presented as sensational. Rejecting the moderator's line of questioning generally, DeSantis said he would not bow down before the altar of political correctness, after first asking: "How am I supposed to know every single statement somebody makes?"

In a Daily Beast story headlined, "Association With Extremist David Horowitz Catches Up With Ron DeSantis," Radosh wrote:

Forget about “every statement”—DeSantis could have listened to just about any statement Horowitz has made in the last few years.

I have known David Horowitz for about 50 years. He is not, and never has been, a racist, and has defended himself ably from that charge.

But, Radosh continued, he did support "the overt racist Roy Moore" because, as Horowitz told him, "Trump needed every vote he could get in the Senate." 

That’s typical of how Horowitz has gone off the deep end in recent years and in his support of Trump.

Horowitz followed this up at FP with a piece called "A FLORIDA LYNCHING & A BROKEN FRIENDSHIP." Note the subtitle: "When a vote for Trump provides a license to destroy a man’s character and credibility by any means necessary." That would be Horowitz's "vote for Trump."

We'll pick Horowitz up addressing the Radosh piece here:  

In other words, to save the failing racist narrative [about Horowitz], Radosh was adding another character assassination -“extremist” - to the implausible “white supremacist.”

Wait -- is he writing about the same piece? 

Radosh did have the decency to write: “I have known David Horowitz for about 50 years. He is not, and never has been, a racist, and has defended himself ably from that charge.”

Sniff.

Back to the sturm und drang.

Unfortunately – and incomprehensibly - Radosh chose to preface that honest character witness with a reckless jibe at DeSantis for asking how he could be held responsible for everything I have said: “Forget about ‘every statement,’” Radosh wrote, “DeSantis could have listened to just about any statement Horowitz has made in the last few years.” 

Whoa -- he said ... that?????? 

In other words, any statement would demonstrate that I am an unhinged extremist. This is what you might call throwing mud at the wall – in this case me – and hoping something will stick.

Trust me. When these guys throw mud, they throw mud. They don't say: DeSantis could have listened to just about any statement Horowitz has made kootchy koo ...

I dunno. Maybe I'm being a little cynical, but somehow this just doesn't pulse with genuine emotion, and especially not when we consider the source, Horowitz, came out as a conservative following Reagan's re-election landslide after an earlier life as a hardened Marxist operative, not a tiny glass animal. In sum, I'm still not buying. In fact, drawing on my personal experience and study, I have even more questions. What sort of serious "anti-Communist" initiates a toxic  disinformation war against the partly restored pantheon of bona fide anti-Communuist patriots, long forgotten or reviled by "court historians," as presented in American Betrayal? What sort of serious  anti-Communist resorts to lies and distortions to try to denigrate a more complete accounting of the impact of Communist influence on this nation? What sort of serious anti-Communist seeks, overall, to perpetuate the Communist calumnies against the great Joseph McCarthy, and related misunderstandings of "McCarthyism"?

Horowitz even has to drag in McCarthy in to frame Radosh.

"What inspires Radosh’s reckless attacks on me is that I voted for Trump," Horowitz writes -- sticking with the emotional, determinedly non-ideological explanation. He describes the bestselling book he wrote about Trump, Big Agenda: Trump’s Plan to Save America.” The book "received a favorable notice from Huffington Post," Horowitz explains. The review concludes: “Horowitz’s book will be an epiphany for those who haven’t been paying attention to the political landscape over the last ten years, but it is common sense for the rest of us.”

The theme of the 2017 Greenfield piece now recurs. Radosh is simply not paying attention and/or refuses to face facts. No ideological break. Now I see why, their lifelong friendship supposedly "broken" over the 2016 election, Horowitz was still trolling FP commenters as late as the Greenfield piece in August 2017 to defend Radosh and scold FP's own readers for calling Radosh a recidivist Communist or Marxist. Nope, Radosh was just "returning" to "McCarthyism accustions." 

Does any of this really pass for serious debate? It kinda seems pretty dumb to me -- and ginned-up above all. 

H. sums up:

But not [common sense] for Radosh, a Never Trumper who has gone over to the other side of the political divide to join a disgraceful lynch party in its attempt to destroy a decent and good man in Ron DeSantis. For Radosh, the ends now apparently justify the means. Once known as a critic of Joseph McCarthy, Radosh’s hatred of Trump has caused him to join a witch-hunt that dwarfs anything McCarthy ever attempted.

On second thought, it's worse than dumb. Implicit in Horowitz's culiminating statement is the age-old calumny: that McCarthy engaged in a "witch-hunt" -- a hunt for something that was not there, when, in fact, Communists were there by the score, if not by the hundred, or more. Certainly now, more than a decade after the publication of Blacklisted by History, M. Stanton Evans' masterful, revisionist biography of McCarthy, how can a serious anti-Communists still view such agit prop as anything but the 1950s fulcrum of the Communist Left's original will to power? Destroy, demoralize, isolate the anti-Communist opposition, and the Revolution will triumph.

Does David Horowitz not realize this? Perhaps you'd like to buy a bridge?

To be continued, sometime. 

 

Tags:

AVAILABLE AT AMAZON

ALSO AT AUDIBLE 

"A sterling example of penetrating counterintelligence analysis, the kind one seldom sees issuing from intelligence circles, let alone from a private researcher. Diana’s previous books mark her as one who goes far beyond the usual academic policy analysis, to penetrate to the heart of hidden history that seldom makes it to the light of day. Reading The Red Thread prompted me to recall Honoré de Balzac’s observation that there are two histories: the official one, mendacious; and the secret history, shameless, but the real cause of events. Diana West plumbs the depths of Balzac’s secret history in a way that surfaces the realities of an ideological underworld that too many deny and would rather not see exposed. Diana West is a one-person intelligence agency."

— John J. Dziak, Ph.D., former senior intelligence executive, author of Chekisty: A History of the KGB, Adjunct Professor at the Institute of World Politics, Washington, D.C.

"Once again, Diana West provides us with invaluable analysis, meticulously documented. She exposes the radical Leftist ideological roots of the Trump "lawfare” coup plotters masquerading as “respectable” Establishment law enforcement and intelligence professionals. Ms. West delivers facts, history,  documentation and context like no other. Her work in essential reading."

— Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations & Research for Judicial Watch. He is a former Military Intelligence officer and Special Agent of U.S. Army Counterintelligence. 

"An extraordinary contribution to understanding the struggle of our times. Diana West has once again done exhaustive research and unearthed a series of facts and connections which will change how you see the American left decisively. This is courageous groundbreaking work with enormous implications for understanding the depth and intensity of hostility to freedom embedded in the American left and its connections to international threats to our survival."

-- Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, Fox News contributor, and author of numerous bestselling books.

"This fascinating new book by Diana West, a leading expert on the history of American communism, offers intriguing insights into the anti-Trump conspiracy. Ms. West teases out highly interesting, and disturbing, facts about many of the anti-Trump conspiracy players. But more importantly, she lays out a larger framework in which to view the philosophical drivers of many of the conspirators, who fall into the Marxist/globalist/collectivist political camp. This is in direct opposition to the capitalist/nationalist/individualistic political camp led by Donald Trump. Trump was anathema to these individuals because he represented an existential threat to the globalist enterprise, which has been so long in the making." 

-- William Marshall, Senior Investigator, Judicial Watch, and an intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, private, and non-profit sectors for more than 30 years.

"Once again, Diana West, as she did in American Betrayal, has scored a home run for truth. Diana's research and analysis are superb. The Red Thread provides an excellent opportunity for Americans to learn the identity of those whose agenda is not in keeping with America's patriotic ideals, and who would undermine its very existence. The Red Thread should be required reading for true patriots who serve in America's government, not to mention those who attend the nation's military academies and war college. Diana West is to be saluted for her patriotism, dedication and her passion for truth."

-- John Molloy, OSJ, Chairman, National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition

"Diana West exposes a red thread running through the campaign to unseat President Trump. It is the story of a socialist cabal painting itself in false patriotic colors, camouflaged behind a facade of national concern. West shows that the conspirators’ true ideals are opposed to nation and Constitution. Yet it is more than a conspiracy she reveals. It is the latest iteration of the same old phenomenon of subversion, driven forward by what Whttaker Chambers called “man’s second oldest faith.”

— Jeff Nyquist, author of Origins of the Fourth World War

"Diana West's analysis of the ideological backgrounds of the DOJ and IC coup plotters against President Trump is powerful, even incontrovertible, evidence of their guilt.  Anyone who reads the Mueller Report or listens to MSNBC, etc. should also read The Red Thread as an antidote!"

-- Dr. Peter Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security. He served on the Congressional EMP Commission as chief of staff, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA. He is author of Blackout Wars.

"Diana West does remarkable work and must not be ignored. Her work is research driven not opinion driven---a rarity in today's world.  It is essential reading."

-- Peter Schweizer, author of Secret Empires and Clinton Cash


BUY THE BOOK AT AMAZON


Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2012 by Diana West