Sunday, December 10, 2023
View Blog
Nov 29

Written by: Diana West
Thursday, November 29, 2018 9:29 AM 

Growing up there was no columnist I admired more than William Safire. I never got a chance to meet him, although I did get to know him, in a way, through writing a profile piece about him years ago for Clay Felker at M Inc. (I must upload it one of these days.) Safire declined to be interviewed. After the piece appeared, however, he sent me this very nice postcard :

At every year's end, Safire would run a column of mutliple-choice-questions on events to come in the new year. (I recently discovered an old set, filled out by New Year's revellers, in my late dad's piano bench.) I am reminded of Safire's annual exercise in crystal-ballery on re-reading a column he wrote about Robert Mueller -- whom he had earlier dubbed "Eric Holder's gift to Justice."

This column appeared when 9/11 was barely nine months old and Robert Mueller was only in the first of twelve disastrous years as FBI Director. Safire's sense of developments, published in a column on June 3, 2002, was prescient in ways that remain chilling 16 years later. It reminds us that Mueller was present at the creation of the Surveillance State he now functions as an unaccountable branch of. It also reminds us that it not only James Comey but also his mentor, Robert Mueller, really ran rings around AG John Ashcroft.

Safire's column is called "J Edgar Mueller" and I am reposting most of it.

Under the police powers it operated under last year, and with the lawful cooperation of a better-managed C.I.A., an efficiently run F.B.I. might well have prevented the catastrophe of Sept. 11. That is the dismaying probability that Congressional oversight (it should be called undersight) will begin to show this week.

To fabricate an alibi for his nonfeasance, and to cover up his department's embarrassing cut of the counterterrorism budget last year, Attorney General John Ashcroft -- working with his hand-picked aide, F.B.I. Director ''J. Edgar'' Mueller III -- has gutted guidelines put in place a generation ago to prevent the abuse of police power by the federal government.

Sixeen years later, Mueller is conducting an investigation seemingly designed to cover up the abuse of police power by the federal government.

They have done this deed by executive fiat: no public discussion, no Congressional action, no judicial guidance. If we had only had these new powers last year, goes their posterior-covering pretense, we could have stopped terrorism cold.

Not so. They had the power to collect the intelligence, but lacked the intellect to analyze the data the agencies collected. The F.B.I.'s failure to absorb the Phoenix and Minneapolis memos was compounded by the C.I.A.'s failure to share information it had about two of the Arab terrorists in the U.S. who would become hijackers (as revealed by Newsweek today).

Mueller's expansive role in the cover-up of these failures and more detailed here.

Thus we see the seizure of new powers of surveillance is a smokescreen to hide failure to use the old power.

Plus, it is also a seizure of new powers of surveillance! 

Ashcroft claims he is merely allowing the feds to attend public events, or to surf the Internet, which ''even a 12-year-old can do.'' That's a masterful deceit: under the former anti-abuse guidelines, of course the F.B.I. could send an agent into a ballpark, church or political rally. All it needed was ''information or an allegation whose responsible handling required some further scrutiny'' -- not even ''probable cause'' to investigate a crime, but a mere tip about possible wrongdoing.

Same with surfing the Net or reading a newspaper or watching television news. Often that's how F.B.I. agents in the field have been alerted to a potential crime, and could then open a preliminary inquiry. If a lead showed ''reasonable indication of criminal activity,'' agents could initiate a full investigation without going through Washington headquarters -- hiring informants, staking out a house, seeking wiretap and search warrants.

But under the new Ashcroft-Mueller diktat, that necessary hint of potential criminal activity is swept away.

It is also true that in the Mueller investigation, the necessary hint of potential criminal activity is swept away as we see in the series of perjury traps set for Gen. Flynn, George Papadapolous, Jerome Corsi and others. 

With not a scintilla of evidence of a crime being committed, the feds will be able to run full investigations for one year. That's aimed at generating suspicion of criminal conduct -- the very definition of a ''fishing expedition.''

After sixteen years of this corrupting power, the outlook, the personality, the group-think of the Feds has been completely perverted -- as we see, for example, in the Peter Strzoks, James Clappers, John Brennans of Our Secret Police.

Not to worry, say governmental perps -- we won't collect data in dossiers on individuals or social or political clubs or church groups -- the sort of abuse that suppressed dissent in ''the bad old days.''

We still see no follow-up on any of the Obama administration's scandalous "unmasking."

Just because the F.B.I. brass hats are presently computer illiterate, do they think the public is totally ignorant of the ability of today's technologists to combine government surveillance reports, names on membership lists, and ''data mining'' by private snoops to create an instant dossier on law-abiding Americans?

Consider the new reach of federal power: the income-tax return you provided your mortgage lender; your academic scores and personnel ratings, credit card purchases and E-ZPass movements; your political and charitable contributions, charge account at your pharmacist and insurance records; your subscription to non-mainstream publications like The Nation or Human Events, every visit to every Web site and comment to every chat room, and every book or movie you bought or even considered on -- all newly combined with the tickets, arrests, press clips, full field investigations and raw allegations of angry neighbors or rejected lovers that flow into the F.B.I.

All your personal data is right there at the crossroads of modern marketing and federal law enforcement. And all in the name of the war on terror.

Who even thinks of the "war on terror" anymore? We now build the enduring Islamic threat into our way of life (#submission). Meanwhile, our "personal data" remain under the control of a kind of secret police faction, which, in these interim years, has apparently come to populate much of the government secutity agencies, and now struggles in a kind of insurrection-as-usual against President Trump.  

President Trump, please release and unredact the FISA court applications, the Ohr 302s and the rest of it. These secrets to our surveillance state bondage must be unsealed if we are to break their power.


Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2012 by Diana West